Peer Review Process
Tadbir: Journal of Islamic Economics and Management implements a double-blind peer review process, meaning that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review to ensure objective and unbiased evaluation.
Review Workflow:
-
Initial Editorial Screening
Submitted manuscripts are first evaluated by the editor for scope, completeness, formatting, and adherence to the journal’s guidelines. -
Plagiarism Check
All manuscripts are checked for plagiarism using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts exceeding the 25% similarity threshold will be returned to the author. -
Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two reviewers with relevant expertise, without disclosing the author's identity. -
Review Process
Reviewers assess originality, scientific contribution, clarity of methodology, accuracy of analysis, and relevance of findings. The review process usually takes 2–4 weeks. -
Editorial Decision Based on Review
Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will issue one of the following decisions:-
Accepted without revision
-
Accepted with minor revision
-
Accepted with major revision
-
Rejected
-
-
Author Revision
Authors are requested to revise their manuscript according to reviewer comments within a specified time frame (7–14 days for minor revisions, 14–21 days for major revisions). -
Re-review (if necessary)
Revised manuscripts may be sent back to the reviewers for further evaluation if required. -
Final Decision and Publication Scheduling
Once the manuscript is accepted, the editor notifies the author and schedules it for publication in the upcoming issue.








